Learner Characteristics: age, learner differences, proficiency levels, and motivation.



The age of learner is divided into three; young, teenagers, and adult. Young learners usually respond to the meaning. They do not understand the meaning of each word yet they do what is asked. They both learn directly and indirectly. In the direct way, they use their senses such as touching, seeing, hearing, tasting, and smelling. Interaction is emphasized in this way. Also, indirectly learning directs to the adult unconsciousness where they mention a word and the children will memorize and use it. Since they are very enthusiastic and curious, more attention should be given or they will be mad if they do not get what they want. The ego makes them become the center of the topics. Since they have limited vocabulary, the activities should be simple and the task should be within their abilities and world. In addition, there should be variations of the classroom activities because the have limited span.
Teenagers are the period where the learners try to find their individual identity. In the learning process, they have great capacity to learn, great potential for creativity and passion in proving that they can do it. However, they generally have more problems in social life such as free sex, bullying, hiv, etc. Those actually are not their goals yet they do it to get respect, approval, and appreciation.
The third type of learners age is adult where they study not because it is compulsory but necessary. Teaching adults is easier than young learners and teenagers. They generally have expectations of the learning process. They also have more experiences which help them to understand the material easily. The last, they are more discipline.
Since learners are unique, there are some types of their differences; based on multiple intelligence, aptitude, style, and characteristics. Rhytmic, linguistics, spatial, kinesthetic, and mathematical are the types of multiple intelligencies. It means that each student has his own ability. Learners’ style deals with the way they are learning, for example, he likes to read a book while listening to the music. Aptitude relates to the natural ability about one’s intelligence. The characteristic generally includes tolerance of ambiguity and ego involvement.
Talking about proficiency levels is debatable because levelling creates new problem. However, determining the good and lower students may help the teacher to decide the right method and technique. Also, the treatment for those are different. It is also supported by the motivation which take a big role in the process. Motivation comes both from the individual and the environments such as their family.
Commonly Found Question
The first question is actually relates to the second question. That is how to accomodate the learners’ differences yet the second question specifies it to the young learner and students with special needs. To accomodate those two types of students, the teacher may accomodate them with the strategy from the teacher himself. He can adapt the the situation and the students’ needs. Cheerful environments suit best for young learners. The presenter did not mention the specific method or technique and did not answer question of the students with special needs. A general option offered by the presenter is by paying attention to the special need student without ignoring the other students. 
Critical Analysis
Analysing from the presentation especially the learning style of the students, in fact, there are some teachers who cannot facilitate the students who learn through moval. Worsely, the institution supports the teacher and call the students hyperactive. It is actually caused by the lack of the teacher’s knowledge in knowing the students’ learning styles. They assume that good students are they who listen and participate in the process in a common quiet way. However, it causes problems if the teacher leaves them behind without finding the right method and technique. This analysis also relates to the second question about the students with special need. An educational video from Thailand shows a teacher who has to teach a class in a primary school with one student with autism. Since the system of primary school in Thailand and Indonesia is similar which one class is handled by a teacher in certain subjects, one teacher is responsible. In language learning, autism is definitely a poor student. However, by presenting the material through the interesting things like a fan and using colored chalk on the board, the autism is able to count faster than the normal children. Therefore, before judging a student with poor knowledge and ability, the teacher should find the factors disrupt the process. Then, finding the ways to solve is the next step.
The presenter shows some findings both from Indonesia and other countries which have very different issues. By comparing those, she implicitly argues that Indonesian issues leave behind because they still focus on the teaching and learning problem. Meanwhile, the foreign issues already discussed about the social problem happened to teenagers such as pregnancy, drugs, HIV, etc. In my opinion, there are big gaps in that argument. First, the foreign countries which already analyzed the social issue are English native country. Second, the area of the findings relates more to psychological issue rather than language teaching. Third, the current revised curriculum in Indonesia emphasizes the PPK (Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter). Although we cannot monitor the students’ activities outside the classroom, maximising that element will impact to their behavior. Hopefully, it will be beneficial in anticipating the issues as the foreign country already had.
References

Harmer, Jeremy. 2007a. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Malaysia: Pearson Education Limited.
https://previews.123rf.com/images/rawpixel/rawpixel1612/rawpixel161236523/67422751-super-kids-play-ground-concept.jpg

Comments

Popular Posts